Contenido multimedia generado por el estudiante como estrategia de aprendizaje activo y colaborativo: Una experiencia piloto en la ETSIT de la Universidad de Málaga

Autores/as

Rubén Boluda Ruiz
Universidad de Málaga
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1843-3467
Beatriz del Castillo Vázquez
Universidad de Málaga
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9031-4569
Antonio García Zambrana
Universidad de Málaga
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-7932

Palabras clave:

Aprendizaje, contenido multimedia, Educación, Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Habilidades transversales

Sinopsis

Este libro surge para dar respuesta a la urgente necesidad de incrementar los niveles de motivación y de participación de los estudiantes en el ámbito universitario, concretamente en algunos de los Grados que oferta la Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Telecomunicación (ETSIT) de la Universidad de Málaga relacionados con la Ingeniería de Telecomunicación. La disminución de los niveles de motivación y participación de los estudiantes, tal como se viene observando desde hace unos años, se ha acentuado aún más desde el período de enseñanza virtual debido a la emergencia de la COVID-19. Ante este desafío, se propone como solución innovadora la creación e implementación de una nueva estrategia de aprendizaje activo y colaborativo que se basa en la generación de contenido multimedia por parte de los estudiantes, buscando siempre un aprendizaje de mayor calidad, especialmente en asignaturas obligatorias de Grado. Al mismo tiempo, los estudiantes sin duda pueden desarrollar y fortalecer habilidades transversales como el trabajo en equipo, la comunicación oral y el pensamiento crítico y creativo, todas esenciales en una potencial carrera profesional. En el experimento participaron de manera voluntaria estudiantes de diversas titulaciones y grupos de edad. Los resultados del experimento revelan un alto nivel de satisfacción por parte de los estudiantes con esta innovadora estrategia de aprendizaje y un alto éxito en el logro del objetivo principal, concluyendo que el grado de madurez y responsabilidad académica de los estudiantes involucrados presenta un impacto significativo.

Se espera que este libro no solo sea una fuente de información valiosa, sino también una inspiración para todos aquellos comprometidos con la mejora de la educación universitaria. Que su lectura conduzca a nuevas ideas, reflexiones y acciones que contribuyan a un futuro más prometedor para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en nuestro entorno académico.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

M. Arshad, “Covid-19: It’s time to be thankful to our ICT professionals,” Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 23–31, 2020.

E. Alastor, E. Sánchez-Vega, I. Martínez-García, and M. Rubio-Grajera, In- vestigación en educación con TIC: retos y oportunidades, ISBN: 978-84-1335- 278-7, UMA Editorial, 2023.

D. Yang, H. Wang, A. H. S. Metwally, and R. Huang, “Student engagement during emergency remote teaching: A scoping review,” Smart Learning Envi- ronments, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2023.

R. W. Bybee, “What is STEM education?” pp. 996–996, 2010.

“Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Telecomunicación (ETSIT),” https://www.uma.es/etsi-de-telecomunicacion/, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Plos one, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0250041, 2021.

E. R. Wester, L. L. Walsh, S. Arango-Caro, and K. L. Callis-Duehl, “Student engagement declines in STEM undergraduates during covid-19–driven remote learning,” Journal of microbiology & biology education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 10–1128, 2021.

F. Wu and T. S. Teets, “Effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on student engage- ment in a general chemistry course,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 3633–3642, 2021.

“Universidad de Málaga (UMA),” https://www.uma.es, Accessed: 2023-12- 07.

B. Cornu, “Digital Natives: How do they learn? How to teach them?” 2011.

S. Setia, S. Iyengar, A. Chhabra, A. A. Verma, and N. Dubey, “How well do the students understand the course contents? assessing comprehension through course videos,” Journal of Computers in Education, pp. 1–35, 2022.

A. Aristovnik, D. Keržič, D. Ravšelj, N. Tomaževič, and L. Umek, “Impacts of the covid-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global pers- pective,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 8438, 2020.

R. Gopal, V. Singh, and A. Aggarwal, “Impact of online classes on the satis- faction and performance of students during the pandemic period of covid-19,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 6923–6947, 2021.

R. Tulaskar and M. Turunen, “What students want? Experiences, challenges, and engagement during Emergency Remote Learning amidst covid-19 crisis,” Education and information technologies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 551–587, 2022.

A. Boltsi, K. Kalovrektis, A. Xenakis, P. Chatzimisios, and C. Chaikalis, “Di- gital tools, technologies and learning methodologies for education 4.0 frame- works: A stem oriented survey,” IEEE Access, 2024.

A. Manzoor, “Technology-enabled learning environments,” in Handbook of research on applied learning theory and design in modern education. IGI Global, 2016, pp. 545–559.

J. Richter, K. Scheiter, and A. Eitel, “Signaling text-picture relations in mul- timedia learning: A comprehensive meta-analysis,” Educational Research Re- view, vol. 17, pp. 19–36, 2016.

R. E. Mayer, “Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?” Edu- cational psychologist, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1997.

R. E. Mayer and R. Moreno, “Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning,” Educational psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2003.

R. E. Mayer, “Using multimedia for e-learning,” Journal of computer assisted learning, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 403–423, 2017.

M. Tani, M. Manuguerra, and S. Khan, “Can videos affect learning outcomes? Evidence from an actual learning environment,” Educational technology re- search and development, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1675–1693, 2022.

J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning,” Cog- nitive science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257–285, 1988.

R. E. Mayer, “Cognitive theory of multimedia learning,” The Cambridge hand- book of multimedia learning, vol. 41, pp. 31–48, 2005.

D. Mutlu-Bayraktar, V. Cosgun, and T. Altan, “Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review,” Computers & Education, vol. 141, p. 103618, 2019.

M. Almasseri and M. I. AlHojailan, “How flipped learning based on the cogni- tive theory of multimedia learning affects students’ academic achievements,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 769–781, 2019.

A. Shoufan, “Lecture-free classroom: Fully active learning on moodle,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 314–321, 2020.

R. Lijo, E. Quevedo, J. J. Castro, and R. Horta, “Assessing users’ perception on the current and potential educational value of an electrical engineering YouTube channel,” IEEE access, vol. 10, pp. 8948–8959, 2021.

R. Lijo, E. Quevedo, J. J. Castro, and R. Horta, “Impact of Electrical Engineering Didactic Videos During Emergency Remote Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 19 622–19 634, 2023.

A. Shoufan and F. Mohamed, “YouTube and education: A scoping review,” IEEE Access, 2022.

F. Mohamed and A. Shoufan, “Choosing YouTube videos for self-directed learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 51 155–51 166, 2022. [31] J. Riley, “Integrating YouTube videos in online teacher education courses,” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–84, 2017.

W. Nagler, M. Haas, M. Schön, and M. Ebner, “Professor YouTube and their interactive colleagues how enhanced videos and online courses change the way of learning,” in EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2019, pp. 796–805.

G. Lopez-Buenache, Á. Meseguer-Martínez, A. Ros-Gálvez, and A. Rosa- Garcia, “Connected audiences in digital media markets: The dynamics of uni- versity online video impact,” European Research on Management and Business Economics, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 100176, 2022.

P. G. Lange, “Informal learning on YouTube,” The international encyclopedia of media literacy, pp. 1–11, 2019.

K. M. Tahat, W. Al-Sarayrah, S. A. Salloum, M. Habes, and S. Ali, “The influence of YouTube videos on the learning experience of disabled people du- ring the covid-19 outbreak,” in Advances in Data Science and Intelligent Da- ta Communication Technologies for COVID-19: Innovative Solutions against COVID-19. Springer, 2021, pp. 239–252.

M. J. Lee and C. McLoughlin, “Teaching and learning in the Web 2.0 era: Empowering students through learner-generated content,” International jour- nal of instructional technology and distance learning, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1–17, 2007.

J. B. Williams and J. Jacobs, “Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector,” Australasian journal of educational technology, vol. 20, no. 2, 2004.

J. Hardy, S. P. Bates, M. M. Casey, K. W. Galloway, R. K. Galloway, A. E. Kay, P. Kirsop, and H. A. McQueen, “Student-generated content: Enhancing learning through sharing multiple-choice questions,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 2180–2194, 2014.

D. Al-Jumeily, A. Hussain, M. Alghamdi, C. Dobbins, and J. Lunn, “Edu- cational crowdsourcing to support the learning of computer programming,” Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, vol. 10, pp. 1–15, 2015.

A. Farasat, A. Nikolaev, S. Miller, and R. Gopalsamy, “Crowdlearning: To- wards collaborative problem-posing at scale,” in Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, 2017, pp. 221–224.

Y. Jiang, D. Schlagwein, and B. Benatallah, “A review on crowdsourcing for education: State of the art of literature and practice,” PACIS, p. 180, 2018.

L. Chen, S. Howitt, D. Higgins, and S. Murray, “Students’ use of evaluative judgement in an online peer learning community,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 493–506, 2022.

A. Khalid, “Use of student generated videos to enhance teaching quality in ae- rospace engineering classes,” in ASEE southeast section conference American society for engineering education, 2014.

R. Arruabarrena, A. Sánchez, J. M. Blanco, J. A. Vadillo, and I. Usandiza- ga, “Integration of good practices of active methodologies with the reuse of student-generated content,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2019.

M. Gallardo-Williams, L. A. Morsch, C. Paye, and M. K. Seery, “Student- generated video in chemistry education,” Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 488–495, 2020.

P. Denny, J. Hamer, A. Luxton-Reilly, and H. Purchase, “Peerwise: students sharing their multiple choice questions,” in Proceedings of the fourth interna- tional workshop on computing education research, 2008, pp. 51–58.

H. Purchase, J. Hamer, P. Denny, and A. Luxton-Reilly, “The quality of a Peer- wise MCQ repository,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education-Volume 103, 2010, pp. 137–146.

C. Bryson, “Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education,” 2016.

S. Wheeler, P. Yeomans, and D. Wheeler, “The good, the bad and the wi- ki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning,” British journal of educational technology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 987–995, 2008.

A. Luxton-Reilly, P. Denny, B. Plimmer, and R. Sheehan, “Activities, affordan- ces and attitude: how student-generated questions assist learning,” in Pro- ceedings of the 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 2012, pp. 4–9.

R. W. Lau, N. Y. Yen, F. Li, and B. Wah, “Recent development in multimedia e-learning technologies,” World Wide Web, vol. 17, pp. 189–198, 2014.

J. Pirhonen and P. Rasi, “Student-generated instructional videos facilitate learning through positive emotions,” Journal of Biological Education, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 215–227, 2017.

B. Ryan, “A walk down the red carpet: students as producers of digital video- based knowledge,” International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–41, 2013.

D. Stanley and Y. Zhang, “Student-produced videos can enhance engagement and learning in the online environment.” Online Learning, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 5–26, 2018.

H. Khosrav, G. Gyamf, B. E. Hanna, J. Lodge, and S. Abdi, “Bridging the gap between theory and empirical research in evaluative judgment,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 117–132, 2021.

S. Abdi, H. Khosravi, S. Sadiq, and G. Demartini, “Evaluating the quality of learning resources: A learnersourcing approach,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2021.

G. Gyamfi, B. Hanna, and H. Khosravi, “Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches,” Assessment & Eva- luation in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1129–1147, 2022. [58] “Open Broadcaster Software (OBS),” https://obsproject.com, Accessed: 2024-01-03.

“Departamento de Ingeniería de Comunicaciones (IC),” http://www.ic.uma. es, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Grado en Ingeniería de Sistemas de Telecomunicación (GIST),” https:// www.uma.es/grado-en-ingenieria-de-sistemas-de-telecomunicacion/, Acces- sed: 2023-12-07.

“Grado en Ingeniería Eelectrónica de Telecomunicación (GIET),” https:// www.uma.es/grado-en-ingenieria-de-sistemas-electronicos/, Accessed: 2023- 12-07.

“Grado en Ingeniería de Sonido e Imagen (GISI),” https://www.uma.es/ grado-en-ingenieria-de-sonido-e-imagen/, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Grado en Ingeniería Telemática (GITm),” https://www.uma.es/ grado-en-ingenieria-telematica/, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Grado en Ingeniería de Tecnologías de Telecomunicación (GITT),” https:// www.uma.es/grado-en-ingenieria-de-tecnologias-de-telecomunicacion/, Ac- cessed: 2023-12-07.

“Plan de Ordenación Académica (POD) de la Universidad de Mála- ga. curso 2023/2024.” https://www.uma.es/servicio-ordenacion-academica/ cms/menu/plan-de-ordenacion-docente/, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Guía Docente Análisis de Circuitos (GIST, GISE, GISI, y GITm),https://sara.uma.es/ht/2023/ProgramasAsignaturas_Titulacion_5110_ AsigUMA_52146.pdf, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Guía Docente Transmisión de Información Multimedia (GITm),” https://sara.uma.es/ht/2023/ProgramasAsignaturas_Titulacion_5110_ AsigUMA_52170.pdf, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Tutorial OBS STUDIO,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= FR-RHhK4oNw&list=PLf3MvZeOcz-U49VeJ-2pRFxtdB5Cl-Q2o, Acces- sed: 2024-01-04.

“Crear una vídeo clase con Microsoft PowerPoint (con audio y cámara),” https: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUMkeY-k4CA, Accessed: 2024-01-04.

B. Castillo-Vázquez, A. García-Zambrana, and A. Puerta-Notario, Ejercicios y prácticas de laboratorio de análisis de circuitos y sistemas (4ª Edición), ISBN: 978-84-2747-224-1, UMA Editorial, 2021.

C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” The Bell system technical journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 379–423, 1948.

K. Topping, “Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities,” Review of educational Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249–276, 1998.

“Módulo de taller (Moodle),” https://docs.moodle.org/all/es/Módulo_de_ taller, Accessed: 2024-01-03.

N. Falchikov and J. Goldfinch, “Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks,” Review of educational research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 287–322, 2000.

H. Li, Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen, “Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 245–264, 2016.

K. Topping, “Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility,” in Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Springer, 2003, pp. 55–87.

A. Agrawal and D. C. Rajapakse, “Perceptions and practice of peer assess- ments: An empirical investigation,” International Journal of educational ma- nagement, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 975–989, 2018.

J. L. Pastrana, “Uso de la Herramienta Taller de Moodle para la corrección entre alumnos en la asignatura de informática del Grado de Biología.” in Comunicación presentada en el IV Congreso Internacional de Docencia Uni- versitaria, 2015, pp. 25–27.

“IEEE Xplore Digital Library,” hhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Scopus,” https://www.scopus.com/home.uri, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

“Web of Science (WOS),” https://access.clarivate.com, Accessed: 2023-12- 07.

“ScienceDirect,” https://www.sciencedirect.com, Accessed: 2023-12-07.

I. V. Bajić, M. Mrak, F. Dufaux, E. Magli, and T. Chen, “Multimedia signal processing: A history of the multimedia signal processing technical commit- tee,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 72–79, 2023.

J. Ascenso, E. Alshina, and T. Ebrahimi, “The JPEG AI standard: Providing efficient human and machine visual data consumption,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 100–111, 2023.

F. Zhang, D. Ma, C. Feng, and D. R. Bull, “Video compression with CNN- based postprocessing,” IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 74–83, 2021.

“The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec,” Nokia Networks white paper, pp. 1–24, 2015. [87] R. Sjöberg, J. Ström, Ł. Litwic, and K. Andersson, “Versatile Video Coding explained-The future of video in a 5G world,” Ericsson Technology Review, vol. 2020, no. 10, pp. 2–12, 2020.

Y. Wang and D. Mukherjee, “The Discrete Cosine Transform and its impact on visual compression: Fifty years from its invention perspectives,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 14–17, 2023.

Descargas

Publicado

7 marzo 2024

Licencia

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Detalles sobre esta monografía

ISBN-13 (15)

978-84-1335-346-3